At Fri, 7 Jan 2011 11:39:33 -0800, John Clements wrote: > Taking a step back: is there really anything wrong with such commits? Given > that drdr and e-mail alerts are based on pushes rather than commits, it seems > not unreasonable to just let those be intermediate commits. I can see that > it's a bit easier to give a nice name to a single big commit, but if the > alternative is the fancy dance that this thread is suggesting, it seems like > it might be simpler just to go with the simple solution (tautology alert)
git bisect is less useful if some commits are broken states. Vincent _________________________________________________ For list-related administrative tasks: http://lists.racket-lang.org/listinfo/dev
