This means you think that re-providing should act like a provide/contract with the any/c contract (as it is currently (attempting) to do)?
Robby On Sat, Jan 15, 2011 at 11:14 AM, Matthias Felleisen <[email protected]> wrote: > > I think the bottom line is that we should stick to the explicit notion of > re-exporting and this 'feels' right given the general eq? problem. _________________________________________________ For list-related administrative tasks: http://lists.racket-lang.org/listinfo/dev
