On Thu, Mar 17, 2011 at 3:34 PM, Matthias Felleisen <[email protected]> wrote: > > 1. I think we should stay away from 'stream' here. > If Racket had grown out of the Unix tradition, I'd > be fine with it. But we partially grew out the > functional community, and they use 'stream' for > a narrower concept.
I thought that Matthew was proposing to use `stream' to mean just what Scheme/Haskell/etc people mean by streams. Was that not the suggestion? -- sam th [email protected] _________________________________________________ For list-related administrative tasks: http://lists.racket-lang.org/listinfo/dev
