At Thu, 7 Apr 2011 12:05:01 -0600, Matthew Flatt wrote: > At Thu, 7 Apr 2011 13:29:10 -0400, Matthias Felleisen wrote: > > I suspect that this is a bug > > in arity checking/reporting (at Matthew's level). > > Me too, since I changed something related, but I haven't been able to > replicate the problem so far. Let me know if you can.
Fixed. It was an arity-reporting bug, but not as new as I thought. The key ingredients were `for-each' and a chaperoned (via a contract) procedure. _________________________________________________ For list-related administrative tasks: http://lists.racket-lang.org/listinfo/dev
