On Fri, Apr 8, 2011 at 10:57 AM, Robby Findler <[email protected]> wrote: > I think I'm not in favor of the move of parametric/c into the contract > library. Sam and I had a discussion about this is Austin, tho, so > maybe I'm misremembering the outcome?
One of us is definitely misremembering the outcome -- my memory was that we decided that `parametric/c' was important and belonged alongside `new-exists/c'. -- sam th [email protected] _________________________________________________ For list-related administrative tasks: http://lists.racket-lang.org/listinfo/dev
