I believe that every directory named tests is dropped when making the
normal distribution, yes.
But most tests already reside in subdirectories of the tests collection,
whereas the new files were all put in tests subdirectories of each
collection directory. So now there is both, eg,
<collects>/tests/macro-debugger and <collects>/macro-debugger/tests.
Ryan
On 04/25/2011 07:15 PM, Robby Findler wrote:
I thought that they weren't in the normal distribution, only the full one.
Robby
On Mon, Apr 25, 2011 at 8:14 PM, Sam Tobin-Hochstadt<sa...@ccs.neu.edu> wrote:
On Mon, Apr 25, 2011 at 8:40 PM, Robby Findler
<ro...@eecs.northwestern.edu> wrote:
On Monday, April 25, 2011, Sam Tobin-Hochstadt<sa...@ccs.neu.edu> wrote:
On Mon, Apr 25, 2011 at 2:32 PM, Robby Findler
<ro...@eecs.northwestern.edu> wrote:
I just pushed tests for all non-racket and non-scheme collections that
makes sure that all of the top-level libraries have their exports
fully documented. I left out info.rkt and tried to drop obviously bad
things from this list, but if you spot problems when drdr complains at
you, please just go edit the file to remove libraries that shouldn't
be there.
Thanks, this is useful.
Is there a benefit to have this spread over all the collections,
instead of in a directory under "collects/tests"?
I put them where they are to catch the default responsibilities in
drdr. But I have no other reason.
Ah, makes sense. However, this has the drawback that they're in the
distribution. Does that need to be fixed?
--
sam th
sa...@ccs.neu.edu
_________________________________________________
For list-related administrative tasks:
http://lists.racket-lang.org/listinfo/dev
_________________________________________________
For list-related administrative tasks:
http://lists.racket-lang.org/listinfo/dev
