That patch looks fine. Do you have any process limits set? (My impression is memory is often limited by default on FreeBSD systems.)
At Wed, 27 Apr 2011 21:42:05 -0300, David Bremner wrote: > > I had to apply the attached patch to get current git or 5.1 to compile > on Debian/kFreeBSD-i386, but then it runs out of memory building the > docs in a 4G virtual machine (with not much swap). > > I'm flying blind a bit here, I couldn't find much documentation. Does > that patch look problematic? Can someone with a stock FreeBSD-i386 > confirm that 5.1 (or git) builds there? > > > From 5da8f3df6174e509c60fc62b3ad0dd6b8ce572cf Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 > From: David Bremner <brem...@debian.org> > Date: Tue, 26 Apr 2011 22:25:55 -0300 > Subject: [PATCH] add sys/cdefs.h and sys/param.h before floatingpoint.h > > This fixes a build failure on GNU/kFreeBSD-i386 > --- > src/racket/src/number.c | 2 ++ > 1 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/src/racket/src/number.c b/src/racket/src/number.c > index aef0c85..b0a76f1 100644 > --- a/src/racket/src/number.c > +++ b/src/racket/src/number.c > @@ -183,6 +183,8 @@ READ_ONLY Scheme_Object *scheme_single_inf_object, > *scheme_single_minus_inf_obje > > > #ifdef FREEBSD_CONTROL_387 > +#include <sys/cdefs.h> > +#include <sys/param.h> > #include <machine/floatingpoint.h> > #endif > #ifdef LINUX_CONTROL_387 > -- > 1.7.4.4 > > _________________________________________________ > For list-related administrative tasks: > http://lists.racket-lang.org/listinfo/dev _________________________________________________ For list-related administrative tasks: http://lists.racket-lang.org/listinfo/dev
