At Fri, 17 Jun 2011 14:51:29 -0400, Eli Barzilay wrote: > I don't know why more of these are needed (they seem to be growing > exponentially), but this:
I need racketmod+interaction for some docs I'm currently writing. So I added the others for consistency's sake. > > +(define-syntax racketblock+interaction > > + (syntax-rules () > > + [(_ #:eval ev name e ...) > > + (let ([eva ev]) > > + (#%expression > > + (begin (interaction #:eval eva e) ... > > + (racketblock name e ...))))] > > + [(_ name e ...) > > + (racketblock+interaction #:eval (make-base-eval) name e ...)])) > > is breaking exactly what I committed yesterday -- if there's a bad > sandbox, the error will start with "interaction:". > > Also, I'm not sure whether it's realted, but the `name' input seems > very broken. I've pushed this too fast. I'll revert it. Vincent _________________________________________________ For list-related administrative tasks: http://lists.racket-lang.org/listinfo/dev