On Jun 28, 2011, at 10:52 PM, Eli Barzilay wrote: > An hour and a half ago, John Clements wrote: >> In certain places, I know that we're trying to be careful to >> minimize 'require's that occur as part of DrRacket startup. Is >> 'rackunit' something we're trying to avoid? Specifically, I have old >> unit tests in collects/stepper/private/shared.rkt that I'd like to >> revive as rackunit tests. > > Adding this is a bad idea -- but size is not the problem -- the > redundant dependency is.
The word "redundant" suggests that it's already required... either you meant something like "extraneous", or else I just plain misunderstood. Can you give me another sentence or two? John
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature
_________________________________________________ For list-related administrative tasks: http://lists.racket-lang.org/listinfo/dev
