Yes, I understood you. I'm observing that making it plural is not helping. On Fri, Jul 1, 2011 at 9:06 PM, Eli Barzilay <[email protected]> wrote: > Three minutes ago, Robby Findler wrote: >> On Sat, Jul 2, 2011 at 9:53 AM, Eli Barzilay <[email protected]> wrote: >> > Four minutes ago, Robby Findler wrote: >> >> On Sat, Jul 2, 2011 at 9:41 AM, Ryan Culpepper <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> > re "Low-Level API": the other category labels are generally >> >> > plural, and other manuals might get inserted into this category >> >> > (eg by planet packages) >> >> >> >> The page is regenerated when new manuals are added, no? Just make it >> >> plural then. >> > >> > I also prefer the plural title, as a signal that "more might be >> > here" rather than singular, which begs a question of "why bother >> > with a category for it". >> >> That's not what "begs the question" means and that's not what plural >> means, either. > > By "signal" and "begs" I meant that that's what it leads me to think. > In other words (and IMO) "low-level APIS" makes sense as a container > for more than a single entry so the fact that there is one looks like > more will be there. On the other side, having just one entry with a > singular title raises the same kind of question I'd have if I read a > book with "Chapter 1" but no other chapters. > > -- > ((lambda (x) (x x)) (lambda (x) (x x))) Eli Barzilay: > http://barzilay.org/ Maze is Life! >
_________________________________________________ For list-related administrative tasks: http://lists.racket-lang.org/listinfo/dev
