I agree -- this is not going to be something people write often; it goes into your .racketrc. There's no reason to have a short and confusing name.
On Sun, Jul 10, 2011 at 12:40 PM, Jon Rafkind <rafk...@cs.utah.edu> wrote: > command-repl +1 > crepl -1 > > On 07/10/2011 09:54 AM, Eli Barzilay wrote: >> It's no longer mine, and it's really been years since it was really a hack. >> >> I think that I'll go with a shortened command-repl: `crepl'. >> >> >> On 2011-07-10, Matthias Felleisen <matth...@ccs.neu.edu> wrote: >>> how about ElisInteractiveHack >>> >>> >>> On Jul 10, 2011, at 8:39 AM, Eli Barzilay wrote: >>> >>>> 10 minutes ago, Sam Tobin-Hochstadt wrote: >>>>> Why not `interactive'? >>>> Interactive what? -- It's way too generic. >>>> >>>> >>>>> And this is for the name of the module, right? >>>> A new toplevel collection. Used similarly to readline. (And >>>> supersedes it, hopefully, for casual users.) >>>> >>>> -- >>>> ((lambda (x) (x x)) (lambda (x) (x x))) Eli Barzilay: >>>> http://barzilay.org/ Maze is Life! >>>> _________________________________________________ >>>> For list-related administrative tasks: >>>> http://lists.racket-lang.org/listinfo/dev >>> >> > > _________________________________________________ > For list-related administrative tasks: > http://lists.racket-lang.org/listinfo/dev > -- sam th sa...@ccs.neu.edu _________________________________________________ For list-related administrative tasks: http://lists.racket-lang.org/listinfo/dev