At Mon, 8 Aug 2011 10:59:24 -0500, Robby Findler wrote: > FWIW, please try to avoid race conditions of the second kind.
Some of these I can try to fix. But I don't think all intermittent failures fit in this category. > I think the drracket test suites are special because they fail > not-so-often and I don't actually know how to fix them. If either of > those weren't true then I'd say they should just not run in drdr. (So > the race-condition/using the same file thing fails this test.) Running these tests in DrDr has the benefit of detecting actual breakage when it happens, so I don't think we should give up on this. > PS: I'm also happy if this class of tests only emails the responsible > person, and not the pusher. I like that, and it's probably simpler to implement. Vincent _________________________________________________ For list-related administrative tasks: http://lists.racket-lang.org/listinfo/dev