On Thu, Aug 11, 2011 at 9:20 AM, Robby Findler <ro...@eecs.northwestern.edu> wrote:
>> How problematic would it be if the DrRacket interactions window didn't >> make the namespace it uses for evaluation available to the expressions >> being evaluated? > > How would that work? Could drracket compile the expression in the > namespace that has the insides of the module and then, when evaluating > it, set the namespace back to the one in effect while running the > definitions window? (That seems a bit strange; I don't have a good > idea how it would work.) What I was thinking was more along the lines of disconnecting the value of `current-namespace' that DrRacket sees from the value that the user program sees -- in other words, having that parameter not be part of the underlying shared portion of Racket like `+', but more like the things that DrRacket doesn't share, like its inspector. I think that would require lower-level changes, though. -- sam th sa...@ccs.neu.edu _________________________________________________ For list-related administrative tasks: http://lists.racket-lang.org/listinfo/dev