20 minutes ago, Eli Barzilay wrote: > I just noticed that Stephen added some properties to support the > syntax stepper into racket/private/promise.rkt at 6921960c. This is a > bad idea -- *please* try find a way to remove it.
If all else fails, here's an idea: 5 hours ago, [email protected] wrote: > d948626 Sam Tobin-Hochstadt <[email protected]> 2011-08-10 17:55 > | Use syntax-track-origin more pervasively to get the right arrows > | in check syntax. It's something that is cooperating with check-syntax, but the facility itself is completely independent of it. If there's need for such annotations for the stepper, they might be rephrased in such a generic way -- this might make sense for other macros (and languages), and the generic thing is more easily used by other code. (Even just a rename means that it turns from "something that John or Stephen will change if they feel like it" to "something that you can use to achieve X".) -- ((lambda (x) (x x)) (lambda (x) (x x))) Eli Barzilay: http://barzilay.org/ Maze is Life! _________________________________________________ For list-related administrative tasks: http://lists.racket-lang.org/listinfo/dev
