On Aug 13, 2011, at 11:33 AM, Robby Findler wrote: > FWIW, there is precedent for this kind of thing, namely the properties > that get added to syntax objects to tell check syntax about bindings > that aren't in the fully expanded program (and yeah, I know there is a > pending question about this; sorry I haven't had time to look into it > and straighten things out). > > Syntax properties generally seem like a good vehicle for > languages/macros to communicate information to tools.
Totally, agree, natch. John
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature
_________________________________________________ For list-related administrative tasks: http://lists.racket-lang.org/listinfo/dev
