At Sun, 14 Aug 2011 23:32:48 -0400, Danny Yoo wrote: > Yes! Here's the problem I'm trying to solve: I'm trying to attach > information to a module, and then be able to query for that > information without running the module.
That makes sense. The `dynamic-require-for-syntax' function was intended for that kind of task. At Sun, 14 Aug 2011 23:50:12 -0400, Carl Eastlund wrote: > I've run into the same issue. The way I sometimes to it is to eval > code which requires the original module for syntax, extracts the value > during macro expansion, and produces an expression that quotes it (or > an expression that reconstructs it, if not an s-expression). That approach has been more successful for me, too. I think the eventual solution is a separately loadable part of a module, but we don't yet have that. Meanwhile, I've pushed a repair to `dynamic-require-for-syntax'. _________________________________________________ For list-related administrative tasks: http://lists.racket-lang.org/listinfo/dev
