Here's a rather smaller version, with the same error: #lang racket/base
(require racket/future racket/flonum racket/fixnum racket/cmdline) (define N (command-line #:args (n) (string->number n))) (define (M Ci) (let loop ([Zr 0.0]) (fl+ 0. Ci) (loop 0.0))) (for ([y N]) (future (λ () (let loop-x () (fx< 0 N) (M 1.1) (loop-x))))) On Tue, Sep 20, 2011 at 5:36 PM, Sam Tobin-Hochstadt <sa...@ccs.neu.edu> wrote: > Removing the unsafe operations doesn't change the error. > > On Tue, Sep 20, 2011 at 5:29 PM, Robby Findler > <ro...@eecs.northwestern.edu> wrote: >> Are the unsafe operations ever misapplied? >> >> Robby >> >> On Tue, Sep 20, 2011 at 4:27 PM, Sam Tobin-Hochstadt <sa...@ccs.neu.edu> >> wrote: >>> The attached program works fine, and if compiled, it works fine with >>> small inputs: >>> >>> [samth@punge] r tst.rkt 40 > /dev/null >>> [samth@punge] r tst.rkt 4000 > /dev/null >>> [samth@punge] raco make tst.rkt >>> [samth@punge] r tst.rkt 40 > /dev/null >>> >>> But with big inputs, when compiled, it fails: >>> >>> [samth@punge] r tst.rkt 4000 > /dev/null >>> compiled/tst_rkt.zo::6943: read (compiled): ill-formed code >>> [../../../racket/gc2/../src/read.c:4751] >>> >>> === context === >>> raise called (with non-exception value) by exception handler: #f; >>> original exception raised: compiled/tst_rkt.zo::6943: read (compiled): >>> ill-formed code [../../../racket/gc2/../src/read.c:4751] >>> internal error: failure during atomic >>> Aborted >>> -- >>> sam th >>> sa...@ccs.neu.edu >>> >>> _________________________________________________ >>> For list-related administrative tasks: >>> http://lists.racket-lang.org/listinfo/dev >>> >> > > > > -- > sam th > sa...@ccs.neu.edu > -- sam th sa...@ccs.neu.edu _________________________________________________ For list-related administrative tasks: http://lists.racket-lang.org/listinfo/dev