How does this preserve transparency? Yes, you can break transparency with a handful of keystrokes of your own, but when you do so, you know you're doing it. Now you're supporting it, blessing it.
On Sep 22, 2011, at 12:25 PM, Robby Findler wrote: > On Thu, Sep 22, 2011 at 11:17 AM, Matthias Felleisen > <matth...@ccs.neu.edu> wrote: >> >> On Sep 22, 2011, at 11:52 AM, ro...@racket-lang.org wrote: >> >>> | Add the following keybindings in a (hopefully) transparent REPL-friendly >>> way: >> >> HOW? > > They keybindings automates what you can already do with some three or > four or ten or seventeen keystrokes currently. > > For example, send-selection-to-repl is equivalent to this (on a mac > and assuming that the defs and interactions are both initially visible > and you have something selected (the keyboard focus also has to be in > the definitions, but that's a pre-req for send-selection-to-repl too)) > > cmd-c > cmd-d > esc;control-> > cmd-v > return > cmd-d > > except, of course, that send-selection-to-repl doesn't actually > clobber your copy/paste buffer like the sequence above does. > > There are, of course, alternative sequences that are also equivalent; > that's just the one I probably would have used if I wanted to do such > a thing. > > Robby _________________________________________________ For list-related administrative tasks: http://lists.racket-lang.org/listinfo/dev
