On Thu, Sep 29, 2011 at 1:04 PM, Eli Barzilay <e...@barzilay.org> wrote: > Yesterday, Matthias Felleisen wrote: >> >> On Sep 28, 2011, at 12:01 PM, Neil Toronto wrote: >> >> > 3. Should Module 1's path be 'racket/plot'? I've also thought of >> > 'new-plot' (which is a cute pun on "gnuplot" but inconsistent >> > with other names) and 'rackplot' (which is consistent with >> > 'racklog' and 'rackunit'). Could also go with "omgraph" or >> > whatever. I'm open to suggestions. >> >> I like rackplot. > > (FWIW, I think that the simple "rackfoo" names where "foo" is some > obvious name is already overused...)
I do too, but a) it is some nice uniformity and b) I'm not coming up with any good puns. :) Robby _________________________________________________ For list-related administrative tasks: http://lists.racket-lang.org/listinfo/dev