Yes, you are correct. On Thu, Sep 29, 2011 at 10:25 PM, John Clements <cleme...@brinckerhoff.org> wrote: > It sure looks to me like this sentence from the docs is missing a really > important "not": > > The consequence of this second feature is that place should appear > immediately in a module or in a function that is called in a module’s top > level; otherwise, invoking the module will invoke the same module in a new > place, and so on, triggering a cascade of place creations that will soon > exhaust memory. > > I'm guessing this should read: > > The consequence of this second feature is that place should *NOT* appear > immediately in a module or in a function that is called in a module’s top > level; otherwise, invoking the module will invoke the same module in a new > place, and so on, triggering a cascade of place creations that will soon > exhaust memory. > > Is this correct? I'll change it if so, and apologies if this has already been > fixed. > > John > > > _________________________________________________ > For list-related administrative tasks: > http://lists.racket-lang.org/listinfo/dev >
_________________________________________________ For list-related administrative tasks: http://lists.racket-lang.org/listinfo/dev
