And, how about adding finite? and its ilk from r6rs into #lang racket. I have them in science/math, but they are probably core level routines. I had mentioned before that we probably should see what from science/math might be more useful in the core.
On Fri, Sep 30, 2011 at 12:22 PM, Vincent St-Amour <stamo...@ccs.neu.edu>wrote: > At Fri, 30 Sep 2011 11:31:47 -0500, > Robby Findler wrote: > > Just to clear up one more possible point: the rational? predicate > > actually recognizes inexact numbers, eg: > > > > [robby@penghu] ~/git/plt/collects/drracket/private$ racket > > Welcome to Racket v5.1.3.9. > > > (rational? (sqrt 2)) > > #t > > This is probably less problematic than `integer?', since `rational?' > is (I assume) less used. But this is the same problem. > > If we decide to change one, we should change both. > > Vincent > _________________________________________________ > For list-related administrative tasks: > http://lists.racket-lang.org/listinfo/dev >
_________________________________________________ For list-related administrative tasks: http://lists.racket-lang.org/listinfo/dev
