I've certainly wanted this in the past. Ryan came up with some tricks that made it easier, but I think a separate REPL that basically ran (begin-for-syntax (print e)) would be a very nice addition.
I'm also with Eli in thinking that this should be separate from online check syntax, unless we make the whole repl use the results of online check syntax. sam th On Oct 20, 2011 9:17 AM, "Matthias Felleisen" <matth...@ccs.neu.edu> wrote: > > On Oct 20, 2011, at 8:21 AM, Robby Findler wrote: > > > I also believe that we don't support these programs well as it is. > > I didn't program with closures until I experienced them in Scheme 84 in > 1984. > Perhaps people haven't programmed in syntax REPLs because there aren't any. > But then again, perhaps people see no need. I do start seeing a need and I > am surprised why we haven't thought of this before. Or someone has and I > can't > recall -- Matthias > > > > _________________________________________________ > For list-related administrative tasks: > http://lists.racket-lang.org/listinfo/dev >
_________________________________________________ For list-related administrative tasks: http://lists.racket-lang.org/listinfo/dev
