A few minutes ago, Sam Tobin-Hochstadt wrote: > On Wed, Nov 2, 2011 at 5:31 PM, Eli Barzilay <e...@barzilay.org> wrote: > > > >> > - Typed Racket now supports defining function with optional > >> > arguments using the same syntax as Racket. > >> > >> > * Fixed several GUI problems, including problems on Ubuntu > >> > 11.10 (GTK+ 3) and 64-bit Mac OS X. > >> > >> This should go right after 'raco link'. > > > > Any reason? (I've put it near the end since it's not really > > something that has new functionality like the others in the `raco > > link' neighborhood.) > > Just because it's a significant bug fix -- without it, we look > pretty bad, and we should alert our users that it's fixed.
OK, but the information is still there -- and I prefer coherent text. Anyone cares to second either side? -- ((lambda (x) (x x)) (lambda (x) (x x))) Eli Barzilay: http://barzilay.org/ Maze is Life! _________________________________________________ For list-related administrative tasks: http://lists.racket-lang.org/listinfo/dev