I don't think we want to change how the current url struct selectors work when applied to url structs.
You could probably get away with changing the url struct if you could provide functions that act the way the old selectors used to work -- does that help? Robby On Wed, Nov 23, 2011 at 12:00 PM, <j...@racket-lang.org> wrote: > jay has updated `master' from 6a99c93ebb to 9d8d36e568. > http://git.racket-lang.org/plt/6a99c93ebb..9d8d36e568 > > > 7f9818b Jay McCarthy <j...@racket-lang.org> 2011-11-23 10:35 > : > | This fixes 10497 and potentially breaks programs that assume the query of a > URL is always a list. I have fixed uses in the Web Server, which I expect is > the major thing affected, but much more could be. Therefore I am skeptical > this is a good idea just for the representation of ?. So, I'd like other > people to review the change and let me know if they think I should revert it. > : _________________________________________________ For list-related administrative tasks: http://lists.racket-lang.org/listinfo/dev
