On Fri, Jan 13, 2012 at 7:09 PM, Neil Toronto <neil.toro...@gmail.com> wrote: > I agree with everybody, especially Sam. :) > > We're supposed to have a rich compiler extension API, in which programs > evaluated at expansion time are just as capable as runtime programs. > Further, "building Racket" means "expanding Racket code fully" which means > "running Racket code," so the build environment should be the same as the > runtime. Ideally, we would get these servers up to snuff. > > I can see how we might need to make concessions, though, so I'm willing to > toss my elegant solution (*sniff*) and go with runtime rendering and > caching.
I think that, in the worst case, we should only go with runtime rendering when cairo isn't available at compile time. Robby _________________________ Racket Developers list: http://lists.racket-lang.org/dev
