Eli, with due respect, but I think we know where you stand. If my memory serves correctly, you have collectively sent as many emails/opinions as the rest of the people together :-)
-- Matthias p.s. conceptual art is good art -- helga says so. In that sense, making people think about your logo is *very* good. Good job John and Neil. On Feb 11, 2012, at 2:42 PM, Eli Barzilay wrote: > An hour ago, John Clements wrote: >> >> Would it be productive to choose one randomly on startup? > > (That's avoiding the issue, since a logo is something that eventually > needs to be a distinct thing.) > > >> Also, in case it's not obvious, a rotated and flipped version of the >> logo does recall the lambda pretty clearly: [...] > > That's exactly what I tried to figure out why I didn't see any obvious > lambda when looking at the r logo. The resulting lambda (the one you > attached) is far enough from a proper one that it is not immediately > recognizable, way less when flipped and rotated. (BTW, the first > thing that I see in the flipped+rotated image is a "τ".) > > > An hour ago, Matthias Felleisen wrote: >> >> How expensive would it be to rotate the logo from 'r' to 'λ' during >> start up? Now *that* would be wonderful! -- Matthias > > Pretty expensive, since that's when the machine is already fighting > with loading everything. (And it will need to be a smooth > transformation to make it clear.) > > -- > ((lambda (x) (x x)) (lambda (x) (x x))) Eli Barzilay: > http://barzilay.org/ Maze is Life! _________________________ Racket Developers list: http://lists.racket-lang.org/dev
