On Sun, Feb 19, 2012 at 22:20, Matthias Felleisen <matth...@ccs.neu.edu> wrote: > for/set sounds and looks more uniform with the rest of the loops, no?
I disagree, I think for/union is a natural analogue for for/product and for/sum. Both for/union and for/set should be in the set library. > union you can throw in as a function or for/fold. I found that I use for/union often enough that it's worth writing a for/union macro instead of rewriting the same for/fold boilerplate code every time. However, I'm not sure that I understand what you're suggesting here. -- Dan King College of Computer and Information Science Northeastern University _________________________ Racket Developers list: http://lists.racket-lang.org/dev