Three hours ago, stamo...@racket-lang.org wrote:
>
> f420edc Vincent St-Amour <stamo...@racket-lang.org> 2012-02-25 17:37
> :
> | Add range to racket/list.
> :
> M collects/racket/list.rkt | 14 +++++++++++++-
> M collects/scribblings/reference/pairs.scrbl | 16 ++++++++++++++++
> M collects/tests/racket/list.rktl | 16 ++++++++++++++++
Is there really a need for an N+1 way to do this?
Did you check if there's any code that this breaks?
If it stays, then I'd prefer a version that is more directly
implemented in terms of `in-range' (let it determine defaults), and a
description that similarly builds directly on `in-range' (as the
comment in the code says).
--
((lambda (x) (x x)) (lambda (x) (x x))) Eli Barzilay:
http://barzilay.org/ Maze is Life!
_________________________
Racket Developers list:
http://lists.racket-lang.org/dev
