On Tue, Feb 28, 2012 at 7:40 AM, Matthew Flatt <mfl...@cs.utah.edu> wrote: > At Tue, 28 Feb 2012 07:21:24 -0600, Robby Findler wrote: >> Last I heard, Eli was saying that there was something seriously wrong >> with 'raco setup' on two cores. Did that ever get resolved? > > Commits 012ef60cd545ba and 534886dbe4b6ad (yesterday) were in response > and improved things on my machine, so it's probably worth checking again. >
Here's what I get. Looks like we see improvements to 3 or so places and then don't anymore. But there also doesn't seem to be any bad behavior in there, at least for me (on dual quad-core 2.8 ghz xeon processors). time raco setup -Dj 1 [...] real 17m26.143s user 14m19.715s sys 2m39.913s time raco setup -Dj 2 [...] real 9m16.022s user 13m14.917s sys 3m49.053s time raco setup -Dj 3 [...] real 7m57.370s user 13m50.130s sys 5m15.396s time raco setup -Dj 4 [...] real 7m19.843s user 14m12.368s sys 6m45.303s time raco setup -Dj 5 [...] real 7m12.761s user 14m43.506s sys 8m47.768s time raco setup -Dj 6 [...] real 7m16.931s user 15m9.667s sys 10m46.150s time raco setup -Dj 7 [...] real 7m29.394s user 15m30.409s sys 12m44.665s time raco setup -Dj 8 [...] real 7m29.394s user 15m30.409s sys 12m44.665s Robby _________________________ Racket Developers list: http://lists.racket-lang.org/dev
