On Wed, Feb 29, 2012 at 12:44 AM, Eli Barzilay <e...@barzilay.org> wrote: > 9 hours ago, Robby Findler wrote: >> >> Speaking of which, I've suggested trying out randomly sorting the >> list before. Maybe I'll give that a try next. > > The original reason to use an alphabetical order is to get > deterministic buidls, otherwise debugging problems can be impossible.
Yeah, I was going to pick a fixed seed and just try it to see if it helped, not randomize each time. Robby _________________________ Racket Developers list: http://lists.racket-lang.org/dev
