At Fri, 9 Mar 2012 15:58:11 -0700, Jay McCarthy wrote:
> I just pushed...
>
> - module**
>
> Like module* but combines multiple occurrences of the same submodule
> name into one module*
I like this direction --- and like everyone, I wish for a better name.
I don't like `submodule' or `sub' for this, because it's a particular
way of creating submodules, not a general form for submodules.
How about `facet', with the terminology that "facets" are implemented
as "submodules"?
For example, a module with a `main' facet could be
#lang racket/base
....
(facet main
(require racket/cmdline)
(command-line .....))
but you could also use `(facet main ....)' multiple times to add parts
to the `main' submodule.
> - when-testing
>
> An abbreviation of module** with the name test and the #f language
I agree with Eli that if we have a good replacement for `submodule**',
then we may not need this one. For example, I like
(facet test ....)
better than
(when-testing ....)
> - raco test
>
> Finds all the files in a directory and requires their test module
Good!
_________________________
Racket Developers list:
http://lists.racket-lang.org/dev
