On Mar 10, 2012, at 6:26 PM, Eli Barzilay wrote: > I first > thought that the whole point of allowing a sub-`module' would be to > have some otherwise-inaccessible private code in it (as the fictitious > author of that `my-code' module thinks).
I second this impression, as I have done in previous private message. _________________________ Racket Developers list: http://lists.racket-lang.org/dev
