On Sat, Mar 31, 2012 at 4:49 PM, Eli Barzilay <[email protected]> wrote: > Yesterday, Robby Findler wrote: >> On Fri, Mar 30, 2012 at 9:28 AM, Eli Barzilay <[email protected]> wrote: >> > It's cute that it's running `main' and `test' -- but I can see >> > uses for disabling either, or wanting to run something >> > else. Maybe turn it from an option to control running `test' to a >> > field with names of submodules that should be run instead? >> >> Okay, I've done that (using a popup menu). > > Very nice. Two minor points: the first thing I did was to add a > "foo", but that just adds the option and doesn't select it; the second > one is that once it's added, there's no way to remove it. Both not > too important.
Thanks. I've fixed the former (I meant to do that, actually, but forgot), and the second I intentionally left out for now, since it seems to clutter the GUI without too much value. > >> > (Even cuter would be to add some dropdown menu with checkboxes for >> > each of the submodules that are found in the current definitions.) >> >> In principle, I could use the online expansion stuff to do this. >> Maybe some day. > > Something that I thought about earlier is that choosing a new > submodule name would actually run it -- but that has a problem since > it doesn't correspond to the main run button. Another possibility: if > you find submodules in the definitions, you show a button for each > one, which results in a very nice language-based feature for running > tests. Could even be hooked on the "run" button, as an additional > dropdown thing that lets you choose which part to run. > Yeah, something like that is what I had in mind after reading your earlier comments. It would be nice. Robby _________________________ Racket Developers list: http://lists.racket-lang.org/dev
