OK, thanks. Just wanted to make sure something wasn't broken. It's only a minor inconvenience - my students are using the version from the download page, while I usually use one built from source, but I've just been using the regular 5.2.1 version to run their programs. In any event, perhaps the documentation needs to be updated: the entry: http://pre.racket-lang.org/docs/html/eopl/index.html#(form._((lib._eopl/eopl..rkt)._provide)) points to the mzscheme version of provide.
--- nadeem On Mon, Apr 2, 2012 at 8:22 PM, Robby Findler <ro...@eecs.northwestern.edu> wrote: > Because it was changed to be based on "#lang racket" instead of the > (old) "#lang mzscheme" not too long ago. I think there was a post here > (or on the users's list) about this, but I'm not sure that this > particular point was mentioned there, so I can see how you'd be > surprised. > > Is this causing you trouble with classes or similar? Would a "#lang > eopl/mzscheme" or something like that be useful for backwards > compatibility? (You'd still need to use that #lang line, tho, since > the regular eopl language is now changed for good.) > > Robby > > On Mon, Apr 2, 2012 at 7:09 PM, Nadeem Abdul Hamid <nad...@acm.org> wrote: >> How come when building Racket from the latest source of the repository >> (at least as of 3 days ago), #lang eopl doesn't recognize >> (all-defined) as a valid provide spec and wants (all-defined-out) >> instead? >> --- nadeem >> _________________________ >> Racket Developers list: >> http://lists.racket-lang.org/dev _________________________ Racket Developers list: http://lists.racket-lang.org/dev
