On May 30, 2012, at 11:32 PM, ro...@racket-lang.org wrote: > | > | This difference is, IMO, a good thing, since it lets you use a single > | interaction to do multiple things, but stops as soon as there is an > | error. (It is also how drracket has behaved for a long time.) > |
I strongly agree with this. -- Matthias _________________________ Racket Developers list: http://lists.racket-lang.org/dev
