On Jun 21, 2012, at 4:23 PM, Ryan Culpepper wrote: > The reorganization would discourage people from trying to add contracts to > modules in the racket/pre-contracts subcollection. It's apparent from the > name, as opposed to being discoverable by running the compiler. > > It would also encourage people to add contracts to every other library.
Amen. > Modules like syntax/stx and racket/list currently don't use contracts; they > use hand-coded checks instead (or they just don't check their arguments). Is > racket/contract/base a "heavy" dependency that we want to avoid for such > libraries? _________________________ Racket Developers list: http://lists.racket-lang.org/dev
