On Jun 26, 2012, at 12:07 AM, Neil Toronto wrote: > It would, and I'd be happy to do it while I'm on vacation next month. Can you > submit a change request? > > More generally, what would the Powers That Be think of my adding various > special functions (like probit, inverse probit, Bessel functions, gamma, log > gamma, etc.) to racket/math? I've already written quite a few in Typed Racket > for my own use. > > Come to think of it, racket/math is a great candidate for being written in > Typed Racket but the racket collection has to be compiled before > typed-racket. Is there a way around that?
I'd love to see math as a TR library. Does it have to be in racket/ ? _________________________ Racket Developers list: http://lists.racket-lang.org/dev
