FWIW, I just tested 16 or so additional PLaneT packages in DrRacket 5.3
pre-release, and no problems.
Neil Van Dyke wrote at 07/28/2012 02:56 PM:
Regarding Racket 5.3, I am more cautious than I recall being about a
previous Racket minor version release.
The information I have so far is mixed, rather that overwhelmingly
reassuring.
If anyone has comments on their sense of 5.3 reliability at this
point, that might help me.
Some good news: one of my consulting clients had me do some
preliminary testing of their large code base with the Racket 5.3
pre-release, and there has been no problem with that testing so far.
However, in testing 5.3 pre-releases with my personally-owned code,
rather than clients' code, so far I've found what looks like 2 bugs in
the 5.3 pre-release. This was surprising to me, since I expected 0
bugs. I have not yet tried the majority of my personally-owned code.
Until I get a better sense, I would expect to keep production servers
at 5.2.1 for a while after the 5.3 release. I'm also probably going
to go to some trouble to avoid using new 5.3 features in some code
that might be deployed to production in the very near term.
More information might be reassuring to me.
Neil V.
_________________________
Racket Developers list:
http://lists.racket-lang.org/dev