On Wed, Aug 1, 2012 at 10:52 AM, Robby Findler <ro...@eecs.northwestern.edu> wrote: > On Wed, Aug 1, 2012 at 9:47 AM, Sam Tobin-Hochstadt <sa...@ccs.neu.edu> wrote: >> On Wednesday, August 1, 2012, Robby Findler wrote: >>> >>> On Wed, Aug 1, 2012 at 8:44 AM, Sam Tobin-Hochstadt <sa...@ccs.neu.edu> >>> wrote: >>> >> The following have been deprecated and will be removed in the >>> >> August 2013 release: >>> >> >>> >> - the `define-contract-struct' form. Use `struct' with `struct/dc' >>> >> contracts instead. >>> > >>> > This entry surprises me. Has it been discussed on the list? >>> > `define-contract-struct` has rather different semantics, right? >>> >>> What difference are you thinking of? >> >> >> `struct/dc` uses impersonators/chaperones to place contracts on the actual >> structure instances, whereas `define-contract-struct` wraps the >> accessor/constructor procedures, right? > > No, that's wrong. struct/dc is like define-contract-struct. Check out > the docs or the IFL 2007 paper on my pubs web page.
Ah, I see. Sorry about that. -- sam th sa...@ccs.neu.edu _________________________ Racket Developers list: http://lists.racket-lang.org/dev
