I always forget too.... Robby
On Fri, Aug 3, 2012 at 4:09 PM, Sam Tobin-Hochstadt <[email protected]> wrote: > On Fri, Aug 3, 2012 at 5:06 PM, Robby Findler > <[email protected]> wrote: >> That's how it always worked, I'm pretty sure. A simple experiment >> seems to confirm: >> >> /Applications/Racket\ v5.2.1/bin/racket -m ~/x.rkt >> main: not defined or required into the top-level environment >> >> You probably wanted racket -tm x.rkt. > > Well, now I feel silly. Somehow I always forget the `-t`. > >> >> Robby >> >> On Fri, Aug 3, 2012 at 4:02 PM, Sam Tobin-Hochstadt <[email protected]> >> wrote: >>> This interaction seems wrong to me. Did we change the semantics of >>> `-m` to only use submodules? >>> >>> [samth@loki:~/tmp plt] racket >>> Welcome to Racket v5.3.0.17. >>> -> >>> [samth@loki:~/tmp plt] cat x.rkt >>> #lang racket >>> (provide main) >>> (define (main) 42) >>> [samth@loki:~/tmp plt] racket -m x.rkt >>> main: not defined or required into the top-level environment >>> [samth@loki:~/tmp plt] racket --main x.rkt >>> main: not defined or required into the top-level environment >>> -- >>> sam th >>> [email protected] >>> _________________________ >>> Racket Developers list: >>> http://lists.racket-lang.org/dev > > > > -- > sam th > [email protected] _________________________ Racket Developers list: http://lists.racket-lang.org/dev
