Was it wrong before? Suboptimal somehow? On Oct 28, 2012, at 9:58 AM, Sam Tobin-Hochstadt <sa...@ccs.neu.edu> wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 24, 2012 at 8:29 PM, Ryan Culpepper <r...@cs.utah.edu> wrote: >> >> samth: >> - type->contract fixes/changes (9e1cf579a4, 962f2472e1) >> - add #:opaque and #:struct to require/typed (9054d0db7d) > > Typed Racket now handles higher-order values provided to untyped > modules under the type `Any` differently. This may lead to dynamic > errors in some mixed typed/untyped programs, which can be fixed by > using more specific types. > > -- > sam th > sa...@ccs.neu.edu > _________________________ > Racket Developers list: > http://lists.racket-lang.org/dev _________________________ Racket Developers list: http://lists.racket-lang.org/dev
