I don't think so. Neither of you appear to have commit c02797b12160651762a769414de06dcca8ba635e.
That version switches you to the "The Racket Language" when you click on one of the examples. On Wed, Nov 7, 2012 at 7:08 AM, Matthias Felleisen <matth...@ccs.neu.edu> wrote: > > In the most recent version (I think), you can simulate Stephen's complaint > like this: > -- switch to BSL, make sure buffer is empty > -- cmd L > -- click on a #lang line > -- when the dialog comes up, say yes to adding the #lang line > Now you're in an inconsistent state. Just run the buffer. > > > On Nov 6, 2012, at 11:02 PM, Robby Findler wrote: > >> I think you missed a revision to the dialog. The currently pushed >> version switches you to the "The Racket Language" when you click on >> one of the examples. >> >> Robby >> >> On Tue, Nov 6, 2012 at 9:59 PM, Stephen Bloch <bl...@adelphi.edu> wrote: >>> Clicking on #lang racket brings up a friendly dialog box saying "you're >>> really supposed to edit the buffer directly... That said, would you like >>> me to add #lang racket to the definitions window?" Sounds good so far... >>> but if I say "yes" to accept this reasonable offer, it leaves me in an >>> illegal state: in a student language with a #lang line. If we're going to >>> add a #lang line, we should also switch to "The Racket Language" at the >>> same time. >>> >>> Stephen Bloch >>> sbl...@adelphi.edu >>> >>> >>> _________________________ >>> Racket Developers list: >>> http://lists.racket-lang.org/dev >> >> _________________________ >> Racket Developers list: >> http://lists.racket-lang.org/dev > _________________________ Racket Developers list: http://lists.racket-lang.org/dev
