If it doesn't match what wikipedia (or some other authority) calls red-black trees, then probably it is best to give it a different name, but if the positional thing can be ignored and you pretty much get a red black tree, then I think data/red-black is probably a good name.
I don't mind if you want to wait and make sure that it actually works for the intended application before moving it. Once we release with it in data/<something>, then we should probably refrain from moving it. But in other private/ places, we can feel more free to change things. On Thu, Nov 22, 2012 at 12:20 PM, Danny Yoo <d...@racket-lang.org> wrote: > > > On Tue, Nov 20, 2012 at 8:58 AM, Robby Findler <ro...@eecs.northwestern.edu> > wrote: >> >> Yes, I think that's the eventual plan. >> > > Ok, I've added documentation. Is red-black.rkt something that I should move > into the data collection now, or should I wait? I was also going to change > the name of the module to "positional-red-black.rkt", since it has a > position-centric view of the world. > > > Happy Thanksgiving! _________________________ Racket Developers list: http://lists.racket-lang.org/dev
