On 11/22/2012 11:33 AM, Eli Barzilay wrote:
Two days ago, Neil Toronto wrote:
Anyway, it occurred to me that I need to provide a more robust way
to generate code for literal arrays anyway. Keywords are more easily
preserved by macros than syntax properties:
Why not use vector syntax #(...) instead of [...]?
That is a fantastic idea. Thanks!
(The problem I was having with head identifiers like `array-row' was
that they got in the way when I was reading the array. Vector syntax
solves that neatly.)
Neil ⊥
_________________________
Racket Developers list:
http://lists.racket-lang.org/dev
