On Mon, Dec 10, 2012 at 11:05 PM, Matthias Felleisen <matth...@ccs.neu.edu> wrote: > > If you can make syntax identifier thingies like and behave as in a > short-cutting way when they are used in a context such as andmap, I have no > objections.
You would need a different list operation -- you can't express `andmap` in terms of `foldr` no matter what you do with `and` (but you surely know that). Sam _________________________ Racket Developers list: http://lists.racket-lang.org/dev
