On Dec 17, 2012, at 12:59 AM, Neil Toronto wrote: > On 12/16/2012 06:41 PM, Eli Barzilay wrote: >> 10 minutes ago, Neil Toronto wrote: >>> I think I'd rather have a convention in Typed Racket that (require foo) >>> imports `foo/typed' when it exists. >> >> +14. I think it came up in the past, but I don't know why it wasn't >> done... > > No consensus? That happens a lot.
It has serious performance implications for untyped modules that require plot -- and these should not be hidden. I know we hide bigint operations but is this an excuse to hide such problems pervasively? W/o support? -- Matthias _________________________ Racket Developers list: http://lists.racket-lang.org/dev
