That's interesting. It's such a different picture than for example GitHub:
https://github.com/languages
We should hire Nate Silver to make sense of it. :)
http://fivethirtyeight.blogs.nytimes.com/author/nate-silver/
On Fri, Jan 4, 2013 at 12:49 PM, John Clements
<cleme...@brinckerhoff.org> wrote:
> This is of tangential interest only; the site
>
> https://sites.google.com/site/pydatalog/pypl/PyPL-PopularitY-of-Programming-Language
>
> does what appears to be a better job of evaluating language popularity than
> TIOBE--among other things, they use google trends rather than search result
> #s, as Joe Marshall has persistently requested, and they try to follow
> leading indicators, rather than trailing ones.
>
> Unfortunately, they don't go below the top ten, and trying to generate the
> search myself produces a message that my search quota has been exceeded....
>
> https://sites.google.com/site/pydatalog/pypl/PyPL-PopularitY-of-Programming-Language
>
>
> John Clements
>
>
>
> _________________________
> Racket Developers list:
> http://lists.racket-lang.org/dev
>
_________________________
Racket Developers list:
http://lists.racket-lang.org/dev
