On Fri, Jan 11, 2013 at 4:39 PM, Robby Findler <ro...@eecs.northwestern.edu> wrote: > > And as you probably guessed, racket/date is the way it is for backwards > compatibility reasons. I don't know how srfi/19 came to be, but it might > just be because someone took the sample implementation from the srfi and > stuck it into Racket.
As it happens, the original SRFI reference implementation was done in Racket (well, PLT Scheme), but appears to have used its own struct. Sam _________________________ Racket Developers list: http://lists.racket-lang.org/dev
