On Mon, Jan 28, 2013 at 8:18 PM, Matthew Flatt <mfl...@cs.utah.edu> wrote: > At Sat, 29 Dec 2012 14:05:08 +0300, Michael Filonenko wrote: >> I have prepared a new version of the patch (attached). > > Thanks!
A question on the design here: why not make extflonums part of the numeric tower? Also, when are extflonums *not* likely to be available? Only on non-x86 processors? Sam _________________________ Racket Developers list: http://lists.racket-lang.org/dev
