On Feb 27, 2013, at 9:07 AM, Matthew Flatt wrote: > > "Cross-phase-persistence-inducing" would be an accurate description, > but that's a mouthful. Is there a short variant that connects to > existing terminology better than "phase-collapsing"?
1. cropping [seriously] 2. I would stay away from characterizing a product via the absence of a property (phaseless). 3. On many occasions people ascribe a property to a description of a collection of artifacts that exists only in each and every artifact. This is especially true in CS/PL/OO. In this spirit, "cross-phase persistent module declaration" would work. 4. I still like phase-neutral because it is shorter and inspires the right kind of thought. _________________________ Racket Developers list: http://lists.racket-lang.org/dev
